[clug] [OT] why "Do Not Call" register?
kim.holburn at gmail.com
Wed Aug 29 13:00:04 GMT 2007
IANAL either but I have been led to believe that either party in a
phone conversation is permitted to record the conversation possibly
without notifying the other party.
On 2007/Aug/29, at 4:07 AM, Robert Edwards wrote:
> Sam Couter wrote:
>> Alex Satrapa <grail at goldweb.com.au> wrote:
>>> I'm confused here - isn't it the case that if you are a party in
>>> a conversation you don't actually need consent from the other
>>> party to record? Or is the law different for phone conversations
>>> because they involve technological thingamajiggers?
>> I've always believed that it's illegal to record a conversation
>> *all* parties giving consent, and the telephone is largely
>> That's why cops will tell you first thing that they're recording the
>> conversation when they pull you over (maybe you don't get pulled over
>> very often).
> And if you don't give consent to the police recording your
>> Not a lawyer, layman's opinion, etc.
> Bob Edwards.
> linux mailing list
> linux at lists.samba.org
IT Network & Security Consultant
Ph: +39 06 855 4294 M: +39 3494957443
mailto:kim at holburn.net aim://kimholburn
skype://kholburn - PGP Public Key on request
Democracy imposed from without is the severest form of tyranny.
-- Lloyd Biggle, Jr. Analog, Apr 1961
More information about the linux