[clug] [OT] why "Do Not Call" register?
sam at couter.id.au
Mon Aug 27 20:58:34 GMT 2007
Alex Satrapa <grail at goldweb.com.au> wrote:
> I'm confused here - isn't it the case that if you are a party in a
> conversation you don't actually need consent from the other party to
> record? Or is the law different for phone conversations because they
> involve technological thingamajiggers?
I've always believed that it's illegal to record a conversation without
*all* parties giving consent, and the telephone is largely irrelevant.
That's why cops will tell you first thing that they're recording the
conversation when they pull you over (maybe you don't get pulled over
Not a lawyer, layman's opinion, etc.
Sam Couter | mailto:sam at couter.id.au
| jabber:sam at teknohaus.dyndns.org
OpenPGP fingerprint: A46B 9BB5 3148 7BEA 1F05 5BD5 8530 03AE DE89 C75C
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/linux/attachments/20070828/283f718f/attachment.bin
More information about the linux