[UNCLASSIFIED]RE: [clug] Detecting malicious former employees

[Michael Still]

Basil Chupin wrote:

> I think that caution is necessary here.
> 
> The original poster did NOT say that it was an (ex)empolyee of his but 
> he was rather asking about a hypothetical situation occurring in "an 
> organisation". However you are now very specifically stating that what 
> is being discussed here is an (ex)employee rather than a hypothetical 
> situation. This *is* a public forum.

We're not talking about a specific person though. I would expect any 
organization to have an "exit checklist" that ensures that someone in a 
trusted position has their access revoked properly. We're talking about 
what should be on that checklist.

(In fact, in the US, it's pretty much legally required).

Mikal