[UNCLASSIFIED]RE: [clug] Detecting malicious former employees
mikal at stillhq.com
Mon Sep 11 20:28:07 GMT 2006
Basil Chupin wrote:
> I think that caution is necessary here.
> The original poster did NOT say that it was an (ex)empolyee of his but
> he was rather asking about a hypothetical situation occurring in "an
> organisation". However you are now very specifically stating that what
> is being discussed here is an (ex)employee rather than a hypothetical
> situation. This *is* a public forum.
We're not talking about a specific person though. I would expect any
organization to have an "exit checklist" that ensures that someone in a
trusted position has their access revoked properly. We're talking about
what should be on that checklist.
(In fact, in the US, it's pretty much legally required).
More information about the linux