[clug] Debian Sarge or Ubuntu for a server?
Martin Pool
mbp at sourcefrog.net
Wed Jun 15 01:41:51 GMT 2005
On 15 Jun 2005, Ian Matters <ian at iristech.com.au> wrote:
> I recognise that Ubuntu is largely targeted at the desktop user
> although with minimal work it seems that Ubuntu "Hoary Hedgehog" can
> (almost) deliver the goods as a simple server. A couple of things
> make me wonder if this is the "true path" though. The first one is
> that Ubuntu has two upgrades per year which is great if you are after
> glitz I suspect that biannual upgrades might get to be a bit tedious
> after a while in a server application.
Just because there's an upgrade doesn't mean you have to apply it.
Old releases are supported for at least 18 months.
> The second is that as a server I would prefer to run the machine
> "headless" i.e. with no monitor, keyboard or mouse. It seems that
> CUPS is broken in Ubuntu to the degree that remote web-based CUPS
> administration is disabled.
This can be fairly easily fixed by changing the cups configuration
file to allow web access. I forget exactly where it is but I have
done it before (on the lca print server) and I'm sure Google knows. I
think you just need to change the <Location /admin> settings.
> What do others think about this? Would I be better to stick with
> Debian and move from Woody to Sarge? Or would I advised to use
> Ubuntu this time around?
I work at Canonical so people may think I'm biased, but I used Ubuntu
before I worked here.
--
Martin
More information about the linux
mailing list