[clug] Memory Leak In cAosity
Alex Satrapa
grail at goldweb.com.au
Fri Aug 5 01:33:22 GMT 2005
On 4 Aug 2005, at 18:53, Sam Couter wrote:
> Linux uses all the memory it can. It's caching stuff so it doesn't
> need
> to read from the disk next time you access it. It also caches stuff
> that
> hasn't yet been written to the disk so it can order writes for better
> performance.
To explain using a concrete example:
[alex at mendel:~]
11:04 [0|2001]% free
total used free shared buffers
cached
Mem: 904428 889916 14512 0 141400
176548
-/+ buffers/cache: 571968 332460
Swap: 1815336 48352 1766984
This means that my computer has a total of "904428"kB of RAM that the
OS can use. The number "889916" means that I'm actually not getting
my money's worth, since 904428-889916 kB of my RAM is not getting used!
Note the two values labeled "buffers" and "cached". As those numbers
get bigger, it means Linux is holding more stuff in memory so that it
doesn't need to access the disk as much - this is a performance
optimisation: use more (fast) RAM to store stuff so you don't use the
(slow) disk during normal operation.
If it wasn't for the buffers and cache being counted in the "used"
value of 889916kB, then I'd find that only 571968kB of my RAM was
being used. If that number in the second row under "used" is steadily
increasing, you might have a problem. In such an instance, tools like
ps and top might help you out by revealing applications which are
individually consuming a lot of RAM, or a large number of small
applications which are hanging around after they were supposed to
exit (for example, a CGI script which forks a thread then never exits
that fork).
I had a problem a while ago where something was chewing up memory to
the point that my database was aborting many transactions due to lack
of available RAM, and the Apache server was aborting many CGI scripts
for the same reason - though to be technically correct, the kernel
logs were telling me that Linux was simply terminating the biggest
memory users. I was never able to figure out what was actually eating
up the RAM - the problem mysteriously disappeared with the next "apt-
get upgrade" and reboot - ps and top weren't telling me anything
useful, the only symptom leading up to the out-of-memory warnings was
a "used" value in the second row that was steadily increasing.
So if the number you see rapidly approaching 100% of available memory
is that one immediately under "used", don't panic. If the number you
see rapidly approaching 100% available is the one two rows down from
"used", you have problems.
Alex Satrapa M: +61 4 0770 5332
grail at goldweb.com.au W: http://homepage.mac.com/alexsatrapa
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 220 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/linux/attachments/20050805/b1f4c737/PGP.bin
More information about the linux
mailing list