[clug] DSL connection: modem or router?

David Collett david.collett at dart.net.au
Tue Sep 28 02:25:56 GMT 2004

If you get the h/w router, theres no reason why you cant still use a
little server PC (your mail server?) as the the default route with DHCP,
webproxy, etc, etc for all the other PC's. The h/w router can just
handle the internet connection for you and act as a hub/AP. You'll just
add one more hop to all your connections (no big deal).

I'd get the router, there cool. Mine is a Linksys WRT54G which actually
runs linux anyway :) (it doesnt have an ADSL modem though, I have a
separate ethernet ADSL modem)


On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 11:55, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Hello all,
> thanks again for the recommendations for ISPs.
> Assuming I proceed with a new DSL connection rather than TransACT, would
> you have any clear recommendation for choosing a DSL modem in preference
> to a DSL router?
> I understand the modem would give me more flexibility in the sense that I
> can route the connection through a small server that I can set up and fine
> tune myself.
> But the router seems convenient in that it takes up less space, involves
> less hassles.  All the household networking handled in one little box,
> with a small degree of firewalling to help security.  I'd be thinking
> about the Netcomm Wireless router, which also provides wireless for the
> laptop around the house, as well as 4 ethernet ports.  Current offers have
> it bundled with a PCI wireless card.
> I would expect to run a mail server for my domain from a small server box
> going through the router (if I go ahead with 1 static IP address).
> I'm inclined in favour of this router.  Is there any reason why I might
> regret going with it?
> Drew

More information about the linux mailing list