[clug] ettiquette dilemma

paul at pabryan.mine.nu paul at pabryan.mine.nu
Sun Jan 18 20:48:40 GMT 2004


On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 03:17:54PM +1100, Brad Hards wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 01:19 am, Ambrose Andrews wrote:
> > what a pain in the ethics. i shall contemplate how (and whether) to
> > breach the delicate subject with the miracle-afflicted persons
> > concerned.
> Please contact them, and ask them not to upload the keys (assuming that they 
> haven't already). No upload = no real damage.
> 
> If possible, please let us know of the key ids. I haven't signed keys from 
> LCA2004, but I don't have your name (or a few others) on the list of people 
> to sign for. I would like to tweak the trust for a couple of people who 
> aren't good at recognising the name of people to sign keys for...
> 

How's this coming? I've been holding off signing keys till I know who's key
not to sign as they obviously don't get the idea. Could you post the ids please?
There's at least two of us now who want to know. Even send a private mail if
your worried about offending anyone.

Cheers,
Paul.


More information about the linux mailing list