[clug] SCO to go after Google?

[Ian McCulloch]

But SCO denies it....

http://linuxtoday.com/it_management/2003112700826NWSVLL

I have been attempting to avoid torturing myself with SCO news until the 
next development that is not based purely on rumor - SCO's only 
tactic is to delay the inevitable for as long as possible.  They 
said they would sue some large linux user within 90 days, I doubt 
they have any intention of announcing anything before day 89 at 
least.

Baring something unexpected the next development of substance will be 
December 6th, when the three motions to compel discovery in the SCO vs IBM 
case go before the judge.

I think the most homourous tactic of SCO so far: In answering the demands 
of IBM to produce the code, they gave them thousands (or millions, 
depending on where you read it;) pages of paper printout of the source 
code to some Unix products (unfortunately none that have any relevance 
however).  When IBM said don't be so ridiculous, give it to us on CD - 
they gave them dozens of CD's with scanned pictures of the printouts!

groklaw.net seems to be the ultimate repository for all details.

On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Alan Sanderson wrote:

> http://www.codefish.net.au/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=488
> 
> Just when you thought that SCO couldn't get any more obnoxious.
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------
>            Sent from Code Fish Web Mail           
>            Code Fish - Fishing for clues          
>            http://www.codefish.net.au             
> --------------------------------------------------
> 
>