[clug] Why wouldn't I use Debian.
rshugg at kinetitech.com.au
Wed Nov 5 16:54:51 EST 2003
We use debian on all our servers, I have always found "non-commercial"
support to be far more responsive and accessible than any commercial
Telek, John wrote:
> I have been asked to build a box for a customer that will run linux.
> It only has 2 do 2 things. Mail relay and DNS.
> After giving it some thought and looking back on past experience, I have
> Given serious thought the using Debian stable rather than Redhat Pro.
> The only reason we use Redhat is because of the "commercial support"
> My concern is that this box is in a DMZ and I personally have found that
> And updates are more often quicker delivered to the debian distro. Also,
> I find updating and
> Package management so much easier.
> Is their any reason, business or otherwise as to why I should not use
> The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments to it:
> (a) may be confidential and if you are not the intended recipient, any
> interference with, use, disclosure or copying of this material is
> unauthorised and prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
> please delete it and notify the sender;
> (b) may contain personal information of the sender as defined under the
> Privacy Act 1988 (Cth). Consent is hereby given to the recipient(s) to
> collect, hold and use such information for any reasonable purpose in the
> ordinary course of TES' business, such as responding to this e-mail, or
> forwarding or disclosing it to a third party.
More information about the linux