[clug] USB 2.0 vs Firewire CPU overhead query.

[Tomasz Ciolek]

On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 08:34:29AM +1100, Telek, John wrote:
> Is it true that there is more CPU overhead with usb than firewire ?

Whats the source of that statement??

Firewire can be more power hungry, because by default it provides a
power bus (most PC cards don't tho).

TMC

-- 
Tomasz M. Ciolek	
*******************************************************************************
  email:  tmc at dreamcraft dot com dot au 
*******************************************************************************
	GPG Key ID: 0x41C4C2F0  Key available on www.pgp.net	
*******************************************************************************
  Everything falls under the law of change;	
  Like a dream, a phantom, a bubble, a shadow,
  like dew or flash of lightning.
  You should contemplate like this. 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/linux/attachments/20031219/28209883/attachment.bin