[clug] USB 2.0 vs Firewire CPU overhead query.
John_Telek at tesg5.com.au
Thu Dec 18 21:34:29 GMT 2003
Is it true that there is more CPU overhead with usb than firewire ?
If so, why cant we have like a hardware enhaced usb that has it's own
local memory and DMA support ???
The reason I ask is I have noticed that my USB/FW external drive seems a
lot quicker when I use FW as opposed to USB 2.0.
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments to it:
(a) may be confidential and if you are not the intended recipient, any
interference with, use, disclosure or copying of this material is
unauthorised and prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please delete it and notify the sender;
(b) may contain personal information of the sender as defined under the
Privacy Act 1988 (Cth). Consent is hereby given to the recipient(s) to
collect, hold and use such information for any reasonable purpose in the
ordinary course of TES' business, such as responding to this e-mail, or
forwarding or disclosing it to a third party.
More information about the linux