No subject
Tue Dec 2 02:44:59 GMT 2003
But the RFC still stands... [From what I read]
===
"Is Linux the Key to Securing Cyberspace?"
Medill News Service (10/29/02); Madigan, Michelle
A Washington, D.C., security summit held yesterday focused on how
open source technologies can more effectively protect networks and
computer systems than proprietary technologies, but the federal
government is still refusing to take sides, according to White House
cybersecurity official Marcus Sachs. Open source code such as Linux can
be more readily customized by users, allowing repairs and incremental
improvements to be implemented on an as-needed basis, noted
Australian software engineering professor and summit attendee Bill
Caelli, who added that proprietary systems prevent such tweaking of
security infrastructure. He acknowledged that both open source and
proprietary software have their faults, but said glitches in an open source
system can be fixed faster. Despite the government's policy of
noninvolvement, federal agencies are not prohibited from deploying
open source technologies, and a few have already done so. Summit
attendee Dwight Gibbs commented that an environment that combines
both open source and proprietary technologies could be the optimal
solution. Sachs insisted that the White House is aware of the nation's
dependence on cyberspace and its vulnerabilities, but said that it would
rather demonstrate leadership than regulate security initiatives. The
National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace calls upon government
agencies, businesses, individuals, and academic institutions to deploy
cyber-defenses themselves. Internet security specialist James Griffin
countered that leaving market forces to work out the debate has
resulted in poor-quality software, since organizations and individuals
have no real incentive to promote security.
--
--------
Steve Jenkin, Unix Sys Admin
PO Box 48, Kippax, ACT 2615
0412 786 915
More information about the linux
mailing list