Get an Ethernet Card (was Re: Has anyone got DSL working with a USB modem?)
grail at goldweb.com.au
Sun Sep 8 23:45:36 EST 2002
On Sunday, September 8, 2002, at 07:00 , bradh at cuneata.net wrote:
> You should look at the code. The UHCI chipset is pretty basic, but
> it all runs in DMA, and the overhead is pretty trivial on any reasonable
> machine (especially if the downstream load is something basic like
> a ADSL link).
It all adds up. A little bit here for the USB support, a little bit
there for the USB ethernet adaptor - that's processor time that could be
better used supporting IPSec, or even just being idle (and therefore
>> So get an Ethernet card - not just for your own sanity, but for the
>> sake of your DSL router's poor little overtaxed processor ;)
My router's processor gets very hot when transferring data over the ADSL
through an OpenVPN tunnel. I do not believe that my comment was totally
frivolous. But that discussion is best left for another thread.
> By contrast, a cheap ethernet card may require you to stuff around with
> figuring out a driver.
Perhaps, but many ethernet cards are supported "out of the box" by most
> ... so why buy more and stuff around with opening the case?
I don't mind "stuffing around with figuring out drivers" if it saves me
all the cable jungle outside my PC. Neat, orderly and efficient - I'd
like to have an internal modem too, but I can't find one that's a real
modem anymore (they're all WinModems these days).
If an Ethernet card is too expensive, then go ahead and find a kernel
with "hotplug USB Ethernet" support built in. I prefer distributing
processing power through dedicated devices rather than using the one CPU
to do all the work, so I'll stick to my dedicated Ethernet cards.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 225 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/linux/attachments/20020908/30963fa5/attachment.bin
More information about the linux