Clusters (was CLUG meeting 23 May 2002)
Simon Haddon
simon at sibern.com.au
Thu May 23 08:07:28 EST 2002
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 23/05/02, 2:30:35, "Richard Cottrill" <richard_c at tpg.com.au> wrote
regarding RE: Clusters (was CLUG meeting 23 May 2002):
> > I don't know specifically what you
> > refer to with
> > the comparison to a beowulf, I wouldn't be at all surprised if there is a
> > grid-ified version. Do you have any links?
> I did a quick google for a brief beowulf intro to reassure myself that
I'm
> not talking complete crap and I found http://www.beowulf.org/intro.html
> I think it's a cluster of dedicated machines; most likely using commodity
> hardware. I think it also implies Linux as the OS. The article above is
> careful to point out that each PID on the cluster is unique - allowing
> easy/efficient IPC between nodes.
> >From your description of a grid it sounds much like mosix. From skimming
the
> Globus intro it looks like one significant difference is that mosix
doesn't
> (yet) support adding nodes on-the-fly (so far as I can tell) and it
doesn't
You can add and remove machines on the fly as long as the range of
applicable ip addresses is pre-defined when mosix is started. As I only
have 3 machines defined I can only use those 3 addresses. If I had more
defined then I could plug more in as I wanted. There is an FAQ on it
somewhere.
> support heterogeneous architectures (yet). It does look like 'grid' is
just
> a way of describing a complete cluster computing environment of a certain
> variety. If I were a cynic I'd say it smells like a bit of marketing
jargon
> (aka buzzword) for cluster.
> I suppose we'll have to wait awhile for the sleepy people to wake up and
> fire back their comments :)
> Richard
More information about the linux
mailing list