Mailman on Red Hat 7.3

Alex Satrapa grail at
Tue Jun 25 13:49:51 EST 2002

On Tuesday, June 25, 2002, at 11:56 , Andrew Pollock wrote a message 
which was flagged by SpamAssassin:

> SPAM: -------------------- Start SpamAssassin 
> results ----------------------
> SPAM: This mail is probably spam.  The original message has been altered
> SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future.
> SPAM: See for more details.
> SPAM: Content analysis details:   (5 hits, 5 required)
> SPAM: Hit! (2.0 points)  Received via a relay in
> SPAM:                    [RBL check: found 
>, type:]
> SPAM: Hit! (3.0 points)  DNSBL: sender is Confirmed Spam Source
> SPAM: -------------------- End of SpamAssassin 
> results ---------------------

I think that's referring to
Received: from (root at 
[]) by

You won't get responses to people who have spam filters in place.  
Consider changing ISPs, or if that network is actually yours,

> It was because /var/log was owned by root:bin and was mode 0700 so the 
> average
> process couldn't get to /var/log to get to /var/log/mailman
> Just wondering if he had an unusual permission set or if the package 
> for Red Hat
> 7.3 is broken in terms of permissions or setuid users or something.

Seems like odd permissions to me.  Someone's tried being too tight with 
permissions - I'd suggest making the directory at least readable and 
executable by the group (make the group "loggers"), and add mailman to 
that group.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 225 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :

More information about the linux mailing list