Installing extra Lan Card
Michael Smarsz
Michael.Smarsz at transact.com.au
Fri Jun 21 07:59:59 EST 2002
-----Original Message-----
From: Alan [mailto:bigal at smartchat.net.au]
Sent: Friday, 21 June 2002 2:09 AM
>I have installed another Lan card into my Linux machine.
>I am using manual IP addresses.
>eth0 = 192.168.0.1 (255.255.255.0)
>Win2000 = 192.168.0.2
>Laptop = 192.168.0.3
>eth1 = 192.168.0.4
What you have done is give your machine 2 interfaces on the same segment/subnet. The subnet mask of 255.255.255.0 effectively means that all addresses from 192.168.0.0-192.168.255.255 are on that interface (local subnet).
Am I correct in assuming that you have 2 nics and no hub/switch, instead you are using 2 crossover cables (one form eth0 to win2k, the other from eth1 to the laptop)? As below
Linux Box
e0 e1
| |
| |
win2k laptop
If that is the case, eth1 will need to have an address from a different subnet (192.168.1.1 for instance) and so will the laptop (192.168.1.2).
Otherwise... you may be connecting as such
Laptop Win2k
| |
| |
----------- hub/switch
|
| e0
Linux
| e1
|
and you are using the linux box as a router/firewall. As above, eth1 will need to have an address from a different subnet. The laptop/win2k boxen think that the 192.168.0.4 address is on that same segment and will not send the address out the gateway (eth0).
>Basically I don't know what I am doing so would appreciate some help.
>- I have configured 'eth1' using 'linux-conf' utility.
I hope I haven't added to your confusion... it makes sense in my mind ;)
>However I can't ping 192.168.0.4 from anywhere (even on the linux machine).
More than likely due to the routing tables associating that subnet (192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0) to the eth0 interface as it was probably brought up first. Same as before, it is sending the request out the eth0 interface - check for activity lights when you ping.
HTH
Michael
More information about the linux
mailing list