C books (was "K&R C book wanted")
simon at himi.org
Sun Jul 28 22:15:56 EST 2002
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 09:02:48PM +1000, Jason Stokes wrote:
> I think the assumption is that everyone these days will want to learn
> C++, which is almost (no holy war will correspondance will be entered
> into) a perfect superset of C anyway. Most new pure C code I see (eg,
> everything in the GTK and Gnome project) which is coded in C seems to
> emulate C++ features like classes and polymorphism to a greater or
> lesser extent -- indeed, the whole design of the basic Unix API could
> be considered an emulation of "object oriented" concepts (everything's a
> file, with various specialisations for particular /kinds/ of file)
> before C++ was available.
> So, ironically, you can gain a greater understanding of a lot of the C
> code you see by learning C++.
Or, alternatively, you could just learn OO concepts . . . And the
consensus on OO and C++ seems to be that it's very dodgy (I haven't
learned C++, so I can't comment directly).
I don't see any assumption that everyone will want to learn C++, at
least not among the people I talk to - C is a lot more popular, as
are scripting languages like Perl and Python, and Java (particularly
as an alternative to C++).
In any case, I really don't think you can learn C properly from a
C++ book. And with K&R out there (even if it is a bit expensive
(though no more so than all the other programming books)), why would
you want to?
PGP public key Id 0x144A991C, or ftp://bg77.anu.edu.au/pub/himi/himi.asc
(crappy) Homepage: http://bg77.anu.edu.au
doe #237 (see http://www.lemuria.org/DeCSS)
My DeCSS mirror: ftp://bg77.anu.edu.au/pub/mirrors/css/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/linux/attachments/20020728/2858e976/attachment.bin
More information about the linux