Good file system / Hdd layout for linux
Peter Barker
pbarker at barker.dropbear.id.au
Sat Feb 2 12:14:36 EST 2002
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Mick Howe wrote:
> I'm insterested I'm peoples opinions regarding suitable file system / Hdd
> layout for linux.
Well, that will vary quite widely, depending on what the machine's used
for. For example, my desktop box currently looks like this:
----------------
[pbarker at bluebottle pbarker]$ df
Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda3 1968620 1437572 431044 77% /
/dev/hda1 38859 13700 23153 38% /boot
/dev/hda2 2048000 1383904 664096 68% /dosc
/dev/hdb1 14998040 7327480 7670560 49% /dose
/dev/hdd2 6047756 384436 5356108 7% /mnt/debian
/dev/hdd1 32175 1366 29148 5% /mnt/debian-boot
moriarty.fith.priv:/nethome/pbarker
153876772 135939204 10121056 94% /nethome/pbarker
moriarty.fith.priv:/mnt/raid/peter/
153876772 135939204 10121056 94% /misc/apps
[pbarker at bluebottle pbarker]$
-----------------
hda1 is a small boot partition, to keep all the stuff lilo needs early on
the disk.
dosc is early since I don't trust windows not to get confused about being
late on the disk.
windows needed more space, so it got another disk to itself. Somehow I
screwed up the partitioning, so it comes in at dose.
the debian partitions are around in case I feel like playing with
debian. Currently I do this by chrooting to those mount points, but they
are bootable...
My home directories are mounted over the network, from....
-------------------------
[pbarker at moriarty pbarker]$ df
Filesystem 1k-blocks Used
Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda2 2172792 1493124 569292 73% /
/dev/hda1 65846 6265 56181 11% /boot
/dev/hdb2 2028771 1557601 366288 81% /mnt/data
/dev/hdb3 7582500 7341068 164396 98% /mnt/nethome-old
/dev/md0 153876772 135939208 10121052 94% /mnt/raid
/mnt/raid/redhat/iso/rh-71-1.iso
656756 656756 0 100%
/mnt/raid/redhat/rh-71-1/mnt/raid/redhat/iso/rh-71-2.iso
652882 652882 0 100%
/mnt/raid/redhat/rh-71-2/mnt/raid/redhat/iso/rh-71-srpm.iso
662348 662348 0 100%
/mnt/raid/redhat/rh-71-srpm
/mnt/raid/redhat/iso/rh72-1.iso
662072 662072 0 100%
/mnt/raid/redhat/rh-72-1/mnt/raid/redhat/iso/rh72-2.iso
653740 653740 0 100%
/mnt/raid/redhat/rh-72-2/mnt/raid/redhat/iso/rh72-errata.iso
358158 358158 0 100%
/mnt/raid/redhat/rh-72-errata
/mnt/raid/redhat/iso/rh72-docs.iso
609840 609840 0 100%
/mnt/raid/redhat/rh-72-docs
/mnt/raid/debian/iso/Debian2.2r2-binary-i386-1.raw
655472 655472 0 100%
/mnt/raid/debian/potato-1
/mnt/raid/debian/iso/Debian2.2r2-binary-i386-2.raw
658456 658456 0 100%
/mnt/raid/debian/potato-2
/mnt/raid/debian/iso/Debian2.2r2-binary-i386-3.raw
565890 565890 0 100%
/mnt/raid/debian/potato-3
/mnt/raid/smoothwall/iso/smoothwall-0.9.9.iso
20344 20344 0 100%
/mnt/raid/smoothwall/smoothwall-0.9.9
/mnt/raid/redhat/iso/rh-70-1.iso
654848 654848 0 100%
/mnt/raid/redhat/rh-70-1/mnt/raid/redhat/iso/rh-70-2.iso
660382 660382 0 100%
/mnt/raid/redhat/rh-70-2
[pbarker at moriarty pbarker]$
-----------------------------
Arguments for hda1 and 2 are the same as the desktop box. hdb is slated
for removal. The raid is obviously for large chunks of data; I export
several directories off this fs, notably the nethome you saw above.
The images are also on the raid, and are mounted loopback on startup for
convenience.
> /\/\ick
Yours,
--
Peter Barker | N _--_|\ /---- Barham, Vic
Programmer,Sysadmin,Geek | W + E / /\
pbarker at barker.dropbear.id.au | S \_,--?_*<-- Canberra
You need a bigger hammer. | v [35S, 149E]
qq%I've never heard of it or used it, apart from finding it in the Camel
book and saying "Oh god".% -- Onceler
More information about the linux
mailing list