debate about Free software for the ACT Government
simon at sibern.com.au
Fri Apr 26 08:40:31 EST 2002
Why does noone think of Star office/OPen office as a viable replacement
for Word/Wordperfect/etc. We have been using it for years and are very
happy with compatability and integration. It only took a friend about an
hour to come to grips with any differences in commands/layout.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 25/04/02, 9:51:51 AM, Alex Satrapa <grail at goldweb.com.au> wrote
regarding Re: debate about Free software for the ACT Government:
> On Thursday, April 25, 2002, at 01:02 , Simon Fowler wrote:
> > It'd be /really/ nice if it was possible to say "familiar with
> > general word processing techniques", rather than "familiar with
> > $wordprocessor"
> I don't see that such a thing is really feasible. When a company is
> already using WordPerfect, they want to employ administrative staff who
> already know WordPerfect.
> Word processing techniques are vastly different between, for example,
> "toy" editors like AppleWorks and "real" word processors like
> WordPerfect. Microsoft Word uses stylesheets, provides an outline view,
> has a revision tracking system, and allows comments to be inserted as
> the equivalent of "PostIt Notes(tm)" into the document.
> I cannot see that there are any skills (apart from typing and knowing
> how to use a mouse) that are portable between AppleWorks, WordPerfect,
> Wordstar and Microsoft Word.
> > ... And I think that's probably what we should be aiming for: not a
> > wholesale migration towards Free Software, but opening up the
> > possibility of using something other than MS software.
> It's a catch-22 - how can employers choose to use another word processor
> (for example), when noone knows how to use it? The greatest cost in
> moving to the new word processor would be training staff to use it.
> The best thing any of us can do right now is list the products that we
> have experience with. If you know WordPerfect, list WordPerfect as one
> of the products that you have experience using. Until these alternative
> packages appear in people's resumes, how will employers know that there
> are alternatives?
> Then you need to develop skills in other packages. By allowing more
> options for your future employer to pick from, you make it possible for
> them to have options.
> > Once that possibility is really available, the Free Software stuff will
> > win or lose on it's merits. As it stands, that's just not possible.
> Another alternative is a publicity campaign to point out that, for
> example, AbiWord and KOffice are Microsoft Word analogues. Publish
> information about how compatible they are, and evangelise. That means
> using those products yourself where possible, and any time the question
> comes up about, "what real alternatives are there?" - you can suggest
> the real alternatives.
> I've picked on Microsoft Word as the example, however the same rules
> would apply for Gimp vs Photoshop, Paintshop Pro, etc. IIRC, the
> interfaces of The Gimp and Photoshop are quite different.
> Having great spelling, grammar and typing skills doesn't mean that you
> can easily adapt to using Emacs vs. vi, for example.
More information about the linux