SSE support in 2.4.x

Peter Barker pbarker at barker.dropbear.id.au
Mon Oct 22 17:44:05 EST 2001


On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, James Macnicol wrote:

> default without needing a kernel patch as was required for 2.2.x.  Can
> someone then explain why I get a SIGILL doing the following :

No, but there's an additional datapoint; it dies on the mov, not the
psadbw. My kernel is not compiled with the PIII option set....

> j-macnicol at adfa.edu.au

Yours,
-- 
Peter Barker                          |   N    _--_|\ /---- Barham, Vic 
Programmer,Sysadmin,Geek              | W + E /     /\                
pbarker at barker.dropbear.id.au         |   S   \_,--?_*<-- Canberra      
You need a bigger hammer.             |             v    [35S, 149E]   
qq%I've never heard of it or used it, apart from finding it in the Camel
 book and saying "Oh god".% -- Onceler






More information about the linux mailing list