SSE support in 2.4.x
Peter Barker
pbarker at barker.dropbear.id.au
Mon Oct 22 17:44:05 EST 2001
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, James Macnicol wrote:
> default without needing a kernel patch as was required for 2.2.x. Can
> someone then explain why I get a SIGILL doing the following :
No, but there's an additional datapoint; it dies on the mov, not the
psadbw. My kernel is not compiled with the PIII option set....
> j-macnicol at adfa.edu.au
Yours,
--
Peter Barker | N _--_|\ /---- Barham, Vic
Programmer,Sysadmin,Geek | W + E / /\
pbarker at barker.dropbear.id.au | S \_,--?_*<-- Canberra
You need a bigger hammer. | v [35S, 149E]
qq%I've never heard of it or used it, apart from finding it in the Camel
book and saying "Oh god".% -- Onceler
More information about the linux
mailing list