TransACT@CLUG this month

[Karun Dambiec]

>
>
>
>From the above I am left with a sense that they think the old plans
>were costed too low (relative to what it costs them? relative to
>what they can charge?) and they want to push everyone into a $200+/mon
>plan.
>
>So, when the dust settles, one wonders how bad the TransACT plans will
>look, especially with the peering service, and maybe some decent
>internal
>caching setup (one hopes).
>
Transact is not an internet service provider, it only provides the network.

>
>Does anyone know how effective the, say, Telstra caching is? What is
>their average hit ratio(% or volume)?
>
>--
>Eyal Lebedinsky (eyal at eyal.emu.id.au) <http://samba.anu.edu.au/eyal/>
>