linux-nisplus digest, Vol 1 #92 - 1 msg

Carroll, Jim jcarro10 at sprintspectrum.com
Fri Apr 19 07:07:22 EST 2002


I saw it on http://www.linux-nis.org/ as well as http://www.linux.org/docs/
.

Jim

> Jim,
>     We don't have the time service enabled and it works 
> great. I haven't seen
> where it says you need the time service enabled? We are using 
> strictly ntp
> with no issues at all.
> 
> Scott Croft
> 
>  
> > Today's Topics:
> > 
> >    1. Secure RPC vs. Time service (Carroll, Jim)
> > 
> > --__--__--
> > 
> > Message: 1
> > From: "Carroll, Jim" <jcarro10 at sprintspectrum.com>
> > To: "Linux-Nisplus (E-mail)" <linux-nisplus at lists.samba.org>
> > Subject: Secure RPC vs. Time service
> > Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 13:21:19 -0500
> > 
> > I was wondering exactly why Secure RPC needs the Time 
> service enabled.
> > Would it not suffice to use NTP?  Why?
> > 
> > Jim Carroll
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --__--__--
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-nisplus mailing list
> > linux-nisplus at lists.samba.org
> > http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/linux-nisplus
> > 
> > 
> > End of linux-nisplus Digest
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> 
> 




More information about the linux-nisplus mailing list