[linux-cifs-client] SMB Trans Vs SMB Write / SMB Read

[Volker Lendecke]

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 06:06:42AM -0500, Shirish Pargaonkar wrote:
> OK.  I was thinking why should named pipe concern itself
> with how a blob has arrived i.e.  either via smbtrans or
> via smbwrite?  For example, in case of QNmPipeInfo, if the
> blob can contain necessary info such as function name
> (0x26) and Infolevel (0x1), named pipe should have a
> response ready to be read.

Please ask Microsoft (and maybe in particular Chris Hertel)
about this particular isse. Unfortunately I don't have
access to Microsoft source code, so I don't really know what
the ways to these functions are.

Volker
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/linux-cifs-client/attachments/20090924/70385651/attachment.pgp>