[linux-cifs-client] Question on current state ofsec=krb5*integration in cifs.ko

[Holger Rauch]

Hi Volker,

Volker Lendecke schrieb am Friday, den 23. October 2009:

> [...]
> For the server you would say "server signing = mandatory",
> no idea about mount.cifs.

For mount.cifs, specifying sec=krb5i instead of sec=krb5 in my
automount map obviously worked. The file system was automounted as
expected.

Does "server signing = mandatory" also include encryption? I did a
"testparm - v | grep server" and additional option containing
"encryption" was shown, so I guess "server signing" includes both
signing *and* encryption, right?

Thanks for clarifying this & kind regards,

       Holger
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/linux-cifs-client/attachments/20091026/c3503f48/attachment.pgp>