[linux-cifs-client] [PATCH 6/7] cifs: Don't use PF_MEMALLOC

Jeff Layton jlayton at redhat.com
Tue Nov 17 05:47:39 MST 2009


On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:22:32 +0900 (JST)
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro at jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> 
> Non MM subsystem must not use PF_MEMALLOC. Memory reclaim need few
> memory, anyone must not prevent it. Otherwise the system cause
> mysterious hang-up and/or OOM Killer invokation.
> 
> Cc: Steve French <sfrench at samba.org>
> Cc: linux-cifs-client at lists.samba.org
> Cc: samba-technical at lists.samba.org
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro at jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  fs/cifs/connect.c |    1 -
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/connect.c b/fs/cifs/connect.c
> index 63ea83f..f9b1553 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/connect.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/connect.c
> @@ -337,7 +337,6 @@ cifs_demultiplex_thread(struct TCP_Server_Info *server)
>  	bool isMultiRsp;
>  	int reconnect;
>  
> -	current->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC;
>  	cFYI(1, ("Demultiplex PID: %d", task_pid_nr(current)));
>  
>  	length = atomic_inc_return(&tcpSesAllocCount);

This patch appears to be safe for CIFS. I believe that the demultiplex
thread only does mempool allocations currently. The only other case
where it did an allocation was recently changed with the conversion of
the oplock break code to use slow_work.

Barring anything I've missed...

Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton at redhat.com>


More information about the linux-cifs-client mailing list