[linux-cifs-client] Re: test status

Steve French smfrench at gmail.com
Fri Jun 26 17:29:08 GMT 2009


Haven't had time to try yet, trying now

On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Jeff Layton<jlayton at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 11:52 -0500, Steve French wrote:
>> Two test runs using "dbench -D /mnt/dbench-test-dir 60" (in this case
>> the older dbench 3.04) :
>> One against Samba 3.0.28a had the usual errors in the cleanup phase
>> (which are hard to avoid due to their broken posix open support but we
>> need to look into more)
>> The test run against more current Samba server
>> (3.4.0-GIT-b660e51-devel) failed though:
>>
>>   60      1834     1.79 MB/sec  execute 304 sec
>>   60      1837     1.79 MB/sec  execute 305 sec
>>   60      1840     1.78 MB/sec  execute 306 sec
>>   60      1843     1.77 MB/sec  execute 307 sec
>>   60      1846     1.77 MB/sec  execute 308 sec
>> (1861) open /mnt1/dbench-test-dir/clients/client27/~dmtmp/PARADOX/STUDENTS.DB
>> failed for handle 10277 (Too many open files)
>> (1877) open /mnt1/dbench-test-dir/clients/client51/~dmtmp/PARADOX/__43904.DB
>> failed for handle 10283 (Too many open files)
>> (1878) ERROR: handle 10283 was not found
>> (1834) open /mnt1/dbench-test-dir/clients/client59/~dmtmp/PARADOX/COURSES.VAL
>> failed for handle 10269 (Too many open files)
>> (1835) ERROR: handle 10269 was not found
>> (1861) open /mnt1/dbench-test-dir/clients/client40/~dmtmp/PARADOX/STUDENTS.DB
>> failed for handle 10277 (Too many open files)
>> (1808) open /mnt1/dbench-test-dir/clients/client58/~dmtmp/PARADOX/__42B96.DB
>> failed for handle 10262 (Too many open files)
>> (1809) ERROR: handle 10262 was not found
>> (1954) open /mnt1/dbench-test-dir/clients/client29/~dmtmp/PARADOX/__43212.DB
>> failed for handle 10288 (Too many open files)
>> (1955) ERROR: handle 10288 was not found
>> (1868) open /mnt1/dbench-test-dir/clients/client5/~dmtmp/PARADOX/__43904.DB
>> failed for handle 10281 (Too many open files)
>>   60      1850     1.76 MB/sec  execute 309 sec
>> Child failed with status 1
>>
>>
>> Can anyone else reproduce this with Jeff's inode patch series?
>
> Strange...
>
> Is this reproducible without that patchset in place?
>
> --
> Jeff Layton <jlayton at redhat.com>
>
>



-- 
Thanks,

Steve


More information about the linux-cifs-client mailing list