[linux-cifs-client] Re: [PATCH] fs/cifs: send SMB_COM_FLUSH in
cifs_fsync
Jeff Layton
jlayton at redhat.com
Mon Feb 23 01:34:46 GMT 2009
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:12:11 +0100 (CET)
Horst Reiterer <horst.reiterer at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Steve French wrote:
> > Suggestions on what to call such a new mount option? How about
> > "nostrictfsync" ?
>
> Sound good, should be self-explanatory for Samba users and those familiar
> with the fsync concept.
>
> Horst.
My suggestion would be to not add a new option until someone requests
it/complains about it. We already have a lot of unneeded/unused mount
options, and I think this will just be adding one to the pile.
My $.02...
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton at redhat.com>
More information about the linux-cifs-client
mailing list