[linux-cifs-client] Status of DFS support?

Ray Van Dolson rvandolson at esri.com
Mon Jul 14 16:43:28 GMT 2008


On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 09:40:48AM -0700, Randy Coulman wrote:
> 
> I've been following this list for a while, but am I having trouble
> discerning whether or not CIFS should support DFS servers now or not.  I
> keep my box (mostly) up-to-date with Debian testing, which as of this
> morning is a 2.6.25 kernel and 3.0.30 Samba packages.  If I upgrade to
> these two versions, should I be able to successfully access my company's
> Win2K3 DFS file server? 
> 
> I've been staying at kernel 2.6.22 plus 3.0.27a Samba packages so that I
> can continue using smbfs to access this server.  Anything newer removes
> necessary pieces of the smbfs support from Debian.
> 
> I'd like to be able to move forward without losing access to necessary
> resources.

I'd be interested to hear status as well.  FWIW, on Fedora 9 DFS access
still doesn't work right (you can mount the DFS root, but the listed
directories just end up being loops to the top again).

Ray


More information about the linux-cifs-client mailing list