[linux-cifs-client] Re: New Proxy Unix CAP

[Jeremy Allison]

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 04:59:33PM +0100, Sam Liddicott wrote:
> * Sam Liddicott wrote, On 21/04/08 09:44:
> > * James Peach wrote, On 20/04/08 18:33:
> >   
> >> If so, could you please add documentation to
> >> <http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/UNIX_Extensions>, or a page that is
> >> linked from there.
> >>     
> It seems that 0x003 was already taken:
> 
> http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/UNIX_Extensions
> 
> says:
> SMB_REQUEST_TRANSPORT_ENCRYPTION 	0x203 	Call to set up an encryption
> context.
> 
> 
> I think it was erroneously in File Info (and Path Info) levels  and then
> just moved.
> 
> Steve, I guess we need 0x204, or shall I change the docs to squash on
> SMB_REQUEST_TRANSPORT_ENCRYPTION?

No, SMB_REQUEST_TRANSPORT_ENCRYPTION is used in current 3.2 code
as a SETFSINFO sub code. 0x204 is used 0x20C is the next unused
SETFILEINFO sub code.

Jeremy.