[linux-cifs-client] Re: proposed new Unix QFS Info level

[Steve French]

"ls -v" on BSD?


On 2/6/07, Steve French <smfrench at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I thought that some backup applications can use this, but also vaguely
> remember
> the problem that NFS has with generation numbers and the suggestion to use
> this
> ioctl (IOC_GETVERSION) to determine if a file (inode) was deleted and
> recreated.
>
> googling for this IOCTL I noticed that straces of multiple applications
> generate this
> so it is clearly used outside of the lsattr call.
>
> On 2/6/07, James Peach <jorgar at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 06/02/07, Steve French <smfrench at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2/6/07, Volker Lendecke <Volker.Lendecke at sernet.de > wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 04:48:06PM -0600, Steve French wrote:
> > > > > To do gid and uid mappings to/from SIDS e.g. to aid in ACL
> > management
> > > > > is probably better done via Volker's UnixInfo pipe.
> > > >
> > > > Not sure the UnixInfo pipe is ever going to make it. I
> > > > recently looked more closely at the registry API. This would
> > > > give us quite a bit of what we need as well from a data
> > > > model point of view.
> > > >
> > > > Volker
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Do you think that there is a need to support
> > >      "lsattr -v"
> > > (or BSD equivalent) over the network?  This returns the version number
> >
> > > of a file (via a "well known" ioctl number that multiple fs support).
> >
> > Are there applications that depend on this (other than lsattr)?
> >
> > --
> > James Peach | jorgar at gmail.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> Steve




-- 
Thanks,

Steve
-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed