[linux-cifs-client] SMB support still missing?
Matt Woodson
mwoodson at gurulabs.com
Sun Feb 4 22:05:18 GMT 2007
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jan,
>
>
>> as of kernel 2.6.20-rc7, cifs still cannot mount Windows 98 despite the
>> source code containing traces that believe it could. (Existence of
>> cifssmb.c) If so, what is wrong with mounting?
>>
>> sk0# mount -t cifs //cl0/c /mnt/0
>> Password: (leave blank)
>> CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 114 mid 1
>> CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -112
>> mount error 112 = Host is down
>> Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g.man mount.cifs)
>>
>
> IIRC mount.cifs won't do netbios name resolution for you.
> Use the ip= option to define the IP address. The Win98 support
> is for the netbios session layer IIRC. This worked last time
> I checked.
>
>
>
>
>
> cheers, jerry
> =====================================================================
> Samba ------- http://www.samba.org
> Centeris ----------- http://www.centeris.com
> "What man is a man who does not make the world better?" --Balian
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFFxk5mIR7qMdg1EfYRAtMAAJ9cySalosxrlzqswWGX5uBo/lcGuQCeMqK1
> 4ESuOUuKCk+oaPIAKIc9d5E=
> =urz/
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> linux-cifs-client mailing list
> linux-cifs-client at lists.samba.org
> https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-cifs-client
>
Jan,
Can you see more information if you use the --verbose with the mount -t
cifs option? I was seeing something similar a few weeks back when
trying to mount a share that shouldn't have required authentication.
mount -t smbfs was working. From wireshark, and higher log level
settings in samba, it appears that smbfs will attempt a username first,
if that's unsuccessful, it will send a null user. I couldn't get cifs
to send a null user. Supposedly user= is supposed to work, but I was
unable to make it work. sec=none is supposed to disable the error
messages you see in dmesg.
The --verbose option would verify that cifs wasn't sending a null user,
just a username that wasn't needed. I am still waiting for a reply to
see if anyone else has seen anything similar. Just curious what your's
showed.
Just a thought,
Woody
More information about the linux-cifs-client
mailing list