[linux-cifs-client] extremely slow throughput writing to remote
shares
Christian Pernegger
pernegger at gmail.com
Mon May 22 19:19:55 GMT 2006
> My experiments with cifs writing over gigabit showed reasonable utilization
> but would be much better [...]
That sounds great, but more like further optimizaton of something
which is basically working. I _had_ transfer rates in the same
ballpark with FTP and was hoping for someone to tell me what might
have broken / regressed / grossly misconfigured.
> The cifs improvement (around 2.6.15) for using iovecs on write (which
> eliminated a large memory allocation on the client, which could sometimes
> cause delays while the client mm hunted for eight free contiguous pages)
> also helps.
Hmm, the machine is on 2.6.15 at the moment, has 2.6.16 a reasonable
chance of fixing things? How much of an impact would this improvement
have, assuming both participating machines have at least 1,5GB free
RAM?
Normal FS writes go into a buffers, to be written out when pdflush
feels like it. I have a feeling this whole caching mechanism is
somehow bypassed here.
Maybe I should dig out a (Debian) unstable installation on another box
to compare.
Thanks,
C.
More information about the linux-cifs-client
mailing list