[linux-cifs-client] Re: NTLM Response in the LM field...

[Steve French]

Yes - it is changed in 2.6.10 version of the cifs vfs code.

On Wed, 2004-12-29 at 15:36, Rudi Chiarito wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 10:22:35PM -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
> > I do think it would be safest for CIFS VFS to do as the other clients do, 
> > and include the response in both fields.  That, in addition to your fix 
> 
> This should already be in the 2.6.10 CIFS VFS. There was no mention in 
> the change logs, but the fix is in the tree. I haven't actually tried 
> it, but I see the change from the bitkeeper bkbits site.