[linux-cifs-client] Should cifs respect umask setting on client? (repost)

[Eirik Thorsnes]

Is my setup wrong or is umask setting supposed to alter default
permissions for new files on a cifs-mount to a Samba server?

Setup:
Samba 3.0.11 server with:
	unix extensions = yes
         map archive = No
         mangled names = No
         delete readonly = Yes
         create mask = 0755
         nt acl support = No


Client: Linux 2.6.10 (cifs 1.28 dated Dec 24), mount.cifs version 1.5
mounted with default options.

Eirik Thorsnes