[jcifs] Is the work-around also the answer?
Caldarale, Charles R
Chuck.Caldarale at unisys.com
Sun Oct 23 17:16:19 MDT 2011
> From: jcifs-bounces at lists.samba.org [mailto:jcifs-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Bret Comstock Waldow
> Subject: Re: [jcifs] Is the work-around also the answer?
> 1) The system worked fine (or so I'm told) until June of this year.
Which indicates that *someone* changed *something* - and apparently didn't get fired.
> Am I mis-reading to think I have read that jCIFS won't authenticate
> at all with NTLMv2, regardless of whether I use the pre-authentication
> or not?
Don't confuse jCIFS (which works fine with NTLMv2) with the ugly wart that is the HTTP NTLM filter which uses a little bit of jCIFS code. The filter has always been a kludge and no one should still be using it.
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers.
More information about the jCIFS