[jcifs] Occasionally NTLM Filter fails...Please Help.
Joseph.Travaglini at FMR.com
Tue May 19 16:16:24 GMT 2009
From: jcifs-bounces+joseph.travaglini=fmr.com at lists.samba.org
[mailto:jcifs-bounces+joseph.travaglini=fmr.com at lists.samba.org] On
Behalf Of Jay Kraly
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 11:47 AM
To: Michael B Allen
Cc: jcifs at samba.org
Subject: Re: [jcifs] Occasionally NTLM Filter fails...Please Help.
Can somebody remind me how to unsubscribe from this list?
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Michael B Allen <ioplex at gmail.com>
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 4:08 PM, John Baker
<jbaker at javasystemsolutions.com> wrote:
> I think you will find that mellowness comes with age. Many people
> the HttpFilter, because it's a valued piece of code - including the
> this thread.
> I've read a number of posts over recent weeks where people have
> help write an NTLMv2 filter. I don't think it's particularly rude to
> to help fix the broken jcifs static configuration to make the Ntlm
> work, and I certainly don't think you should be turning down offers of
> to build an open source NTLMv2 filter. The last time I wrote on this
> a number of people agreed.
> Would it help if I just fixed the broken static configuration code,
> Ntlm filter, and passed back the code for inclusion?
This just does not register with you does it. You are in serious
denial. How many different ways can I tell you that JCIFS is not an
So let me get this straight, you want me to let you add code to JCIFS
(that I previously explained to you in great detail would absolutely
not work) and add HTTP stuff that has nothing to do with CIFS. Then
when it breaks (and it will because you really have no clue what
you're doing) you want me to fix and maintain it? Oh, and for free.
You are funny. Unfortunately for you this list is for serious people
doing *work* so this thread ends now.
-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
More information about the jcifs