[jcifs] Occasionally NTLM Filter fails...Please Help.
John Baker
jbaker at javasystemsolutions.com
Mon May 18 20:08:37 GMT 2009
Mike,
I think you will find that mellowness comes with age. Many people post about
the HttpFilter, because it's a valued piece of code - including the author of
this thread.
I've read a number of posts over recent weeks where people have offered to
help write an NTLMv2 filter. I don't think it's particularly rude to offer
to help fix the broken jcifs static configuration to make the Ntlm filter
work, and I certainly don't think you should be turning down offers of help
to build an open source NTLMv2 filter. The last time I wrote on this issue,
a number of people agreed.
Would it help if I just fixed the broken static configuration code, fixed the
Ntlm filter, and passed back the code for inclusion?
John
On Monday 18 May 2009 20:34:29 you wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 3:32 PM, John Baker
>
> <jbaker at javasystemsolutions.com> wrote:
> > Thank you for your professional response. Clearly, my techincal
> > understanding did not lead me to write an SPNEGO/Kerberos implementation.
> > Perhaps you could outline your thoughts on the pros and cons of
> > SPNEGO/Kerberos over NTLMv2?
>
> Don't talk to me about professionalism. It is clear to everyone that
> you are just being a dick.
>
> Your questions are off topic here. Go away.
>
> Mike
--
More information about the jcifs
mailing list