[jcifs] Re: security policy requires NTLMv2

pardesh pardesh_dsp at yahoo.com
Mon Feb 2 20:44:20 GMT 2009


 <John.Baker <at> barclayscapital.com> writes:

> 
> Mike,
> 
> I see, so you're basically moving the NTLM Filter development to a
> commercial product!  And hence, ioplex is basically another QSJ SSO
> product.
> 
> John 
> 
>


Yes! I think most applications using JCIFS which requires NTLMv2 response  has 
to opt for JESPA.




More information about the jcifs mailing list