[jcifs] Re: security policy requires NTLMv2

pardesh pardesh_dsp at yahoo.com
Mon Feb 2 20:44:20 GMT 2009

 <John.Baker <at> barclayscapital.com> writes:

> Mike,
> I see, so you're basically moving the NTLM Filter development to a
> commercial product!  And hence, ioplex is basically another QSJ SSO
> product.
> John 

Yes! I think most applications using JCIFS which requires NTLMv2 response  has 
to opt for JESPA.

More information about the jcifs mailing list