[jcifs] DAVENPORT and http error 500 UnicodeLittleUnmarked
Christopher R. Hertel
crh at ubiqx.mn.org
Thu Oct 20 18:29:02 GMT 2005
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 01:55:26PM -0400, Michael B Allen wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 12:24:21 -0400
> Richard Caper <rcaper at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Technically, neither does Sun:
> > Charset.isSupported("UnicodeLittleUnmarked"); => false
> > They provide it via the legacy sun.io.CharToByteConverter class. The
> > supported counterpart is UTF-16LE (that should be available in all
> > VMs). Technically, there is (possibly) a slight difference;
> I tried and failed to use "UTF-16LE" originally. Of course this was
> probably 5 years ago. I wonder if Sun's 1.3 does the right thing for us
> with this codeset identifier. If so, I would be delighted to change it
> as UTF-16LE is correct identifier .
>  just curious but does anyone know if these identifers are
> standardized? Some cursory googling turned up nothing.
I believe they're standard. They are documented on the official Unicode
Find the entries in the glossary and follow the links to the PDF...
"Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)----- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)----- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)----- crh at ubiqx.mn.org
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/ -)----- crh at ubiqx.org
More information about the jcifs