[jcifs] [FW: Another transport problem.]
Christopher R. Hertel
crh at ubiqx.mn.org
Sat Sep 13 04:59:42 EST 2003
Forwarded from Dan, who is in the midsts of an E'mail transition.
----- Forwarded message from Dan Dumont <fantom2000 at yahoo.com> -----
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 10:22:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dan Dumont <fantom2000 at yahoo.com>
Reply-To: dan at canofsleep.com
Subject: Another transport problem.
To: "Christopher R. Hertel" <crh at ubiqx.mn.org>
In-Reply-To: <3F61436A.825E94F1 at ubiqx.mn.org>
<snip>remove stuff meant for me</snip>
I was digging through the code when i stubled
upon another issue that you may want to address in
your next patch.
jCIFS stores the tansports in a vector. Thats
not the best idea. When talking to many different
hosts i found that the vector's size gets in excess of
600 transports. I'm not sure how you would want to
handle this, but my temporary fix was to change the
Vector to a HashSet, and have the SmbFile.close()
remove it's transport as well. This GREATLY improved
performance, as the method to get a transport(existing
or otherwise) is synchronized and ends up being VERY
Please forward this to the list.
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
----- End forwarded message -----
"Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)----- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)----- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)----- crh at ubiqx.mn.org
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/ -)----- crh at ubiqx.org
More information about the jcifs