[jcifs] jcifs-0.6.6 released
Michael B. Allen
miallen at eskimo.com
Thu Sep 26 17:52:55 EST 2002
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 21:53:53 -0400
"Allen, Michael B (RSCH)" <Michael_B_Allen at ml.com> wrote:
> Damn. That's 3 bugs. I'll fix these now. Pls hold.
Unfortunately I cannot fix this in 0.6. I did not realize that the
Handler was so neglected. It is clearly not going to work in a
multithreaded environment. The SMB URL code will really have to be
remodeled around the Java URL class. I believe I tried that before and
recall it was troubled.
Anyway, I have applied the Win2K patch and thus 0.6.6. The '@' bug remains.
It's just too dangerous to try and fix it in 0.6. I think if you compose
all SmbFiles with the two parameter constructor and pass the smb://server
and share/me at beach/file parameters separately you're gold. Most
applications larger than a cron job do that anyway and they can use 0.7.
What a shame. I had high hopes for 0.6.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas Krammer [SMTP:TKrammer at nxn-software.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 9:47 PM
> > To: 'jcifs at samba.org'
> > Subject: [jcifs] URLHandler Bug
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'm writing an application which supports various file transfer protocols. The file's location is represented by an URL. First I parse the URL using java.net.URL and then trigger protocol specific
> > behavior. Using this application I found a bug in jcifs.smb.Handler.
> >
> > The jcifs.smb.Handler class stores a SmbFile object used to parse the URL. If any error occrs during the URL parsing that object isn't overwritten. So when a incorrect SMB URL (e.g. containing an
> > invalid host name) is used to create an URL object the last valid parsing result is used.
> >
> > The example code below demonstrates this problem.
--
A program should be written to model the concepts of the task it
performs rather than the physical world or a process because this
maximizes the potential for it to be applied to tasks that are
conceptually similar and more importantly to tasks that have not
yet been conceived.
More information about the jcifs
mailing list