[jcifs] Re: SMB_COM_CLOSE does work

[Michael B. Allen]

On Wed, 21 Aug 2002 13:33:22 -0500
"Christopher R. Hertel" <crh at ubiqx.mn.org> wrote:

> Which servers are you using?  Perhaps there's a difference when talking to 
> different servers.

Actually it appears that this might work after all. Andy Chernow has
found a bug in my implementation. I'll try it later. Don't worry about
my claim that last modified in SMB_COM_CLOSE doesn't work. It appears
as though it does.

> 
> Chris -)-----
> 
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 02:27:15PM -0400, Michael B. Allen wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Aug 2002 13:45:08 -0400
> > "Andrew Chernow" <achernow at unitedstoragetech.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Michael,
> > >     I saw the message you posted about the lasted release of the jCIFS
> > > package.
> > > 
> > > >Didn't get a chance to do NamedPipes available() and it doesn't look
> > > >like setting last modified through SMB_COM_CLOSE works.
> > > 
> > > I wanted to let you know that I did get lastModified time working through
> > > SMB_COM_CLOSE.  I just did what you said, "...add a constructor to
> > > SmbComClose.java and pass the lastWriteTime...".  I made some modifications
> > > to accomplish this.
> > 
> > That's very good news. I must have done something wrong. My implementation
> > of this is in 0.7.0b2. It just doesn't work. Is there any chance you
> > can look at it and see what I did wrong?
> 
> -- 
> Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/     -)-----   Christopher R. Hertel
> jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/   -)-----   ubiqx development, uninq.
> ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/     -)-----   crh at ubiqx.mn.org
> OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/    -)-----   crh at ubiqx.org
> 


-- 
A  program should be written to model the concepts of the task it
performs rather than the physical world or a process because this
maximizes  the  potential  for it to be applied to tasks that are
conceptually  similar and more importantly to tasks that have not
yet been conceived.