[jcifs] Spaces in Share names.
Rob Wygand
rob at filefish.com
Fri Dec 21 17:01:18 EST 2001
Aha!
That explains my confusion! I thought NT LM 1.0 was the latest, so I
could not figure out how things were being differetiated.
I also have Mr. Leighton's book, though I must admit I have not yet had
time to read it. Maybe I'll make some time this break.
Have a happy holiday season, Mike (and everyone else!)
rjw
Allen, Michael B (RSCH) wrote:
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Rob Wygand [SMTP:rob at filefish.com]
>>
>>I tried one other thing... sniffing Win2K I was that it sent a bunch of
>>possible version strings in the post-session configuration request (I
>>forget it's name, the one where you send "NT LM 1.0"). I modified the
>>request to send everything that Win2K was. but that didn't help, alas.
>>
>>
> Those are "dialect" strings. "NT LM 1.0" is the latest as far as I know. The strange thing
> is that the protocol has changed significantly enough to warrant a new dialect string.
> Win98 also negotiates "NT LM 1.0" and it doesn't have all the NT Smbs and
> transactions. Instead they have a separate flag called NTSMBS or something. Anyway,
> the dialect strings are definitely not going to help us with this. I think it's pretty clear
> that the RAPs (e.g. NetServerEnum2 and NetShareEnum) we're using now were
> abandoned by MS a long time ago so we need to get up to speed with Win2K.
>
> We need DCE/RPC. There's a book by one of the Samba TNG guys called "DCE/RPC
> over SMB: Samba and Windows NT Domain Internals" by Luke Kenneth Casson
> Leighton. He's actually posted here a few times. Anyway, I have this book and I'm
> reading right now. My interest was the NetLogon process (this would help Kammy I
> think BTW) but the svrsvc pipe does the share and server enumeration you saw with
> Win2k. It's doable but everything is encrypted and I need to implement the Network
> Data Representation (NDR), all of the Microsoft-isms are TOTALLY undocumented,
> I have to read the opengroup docs, etc, etc ....
>
> It is non-trivial. But I probably would not do it if it were.
>
> Mike
>
More information about the jcifs
mailing list