[distcc] distcc & gcc3.3
mbp at sourcefrog.net
Tue Apr 18 04:11:16 GMT 2006
On 17 Apr 2006, Dan Kegel <dank at kegel.com> wrote:
> On 4/12/06, Martin Pool <mbp at sourcefrog.net> wrote:
> > http://kegel.com/distcc/2006-03-28/01-distcc-gdb-20051210.patch
> > > and I think it's worth including in mainline distcc.
> > Does that give you byte-for-byte identical output?
> In what sense?
> md5sum of the .o's? It can't be that,
> since otherwise the patch would be a no-op.
> md5sum of the generated opcodes? Probably;
> I haven't checked. But I do compile metric boatloads of
> code with this patch every day, and we haven't seen
> any regression tests fail as a result.
> If you define your criterion a bit more closely, I'll try to
> see if the patch satisfies it.
I meant identical .o files between local and remote compilation, which
is what the original poster seemed to be asking. Obviously I don't mean
between distcc before and after the patch.
More information about the distcc