[distcc] Re: distcc on Cygwin w/o fork()

Dan Kegel dank at kegel.com
Tue Apr 4 05:18:11 GMT 2006


On 4/3/06, Martin Pool <mbp at sourcefrog.net> wrote:
> For simplicity's sake perhaps we should just use pthreads
> everywhere.

I'm not sure threads can be called simple...


More information about the distcc mailing list