[distcc] distcc at large sites. Patch to get hosts file from
martinpool at gmail.com
Mon Sep 5 01:38:30 GMT 2005
On 04/09/05, Dan Kegel <dank at kegel.com> wrote:
> Comments, anyone? Seem useful to any other large sites out there?
It seems like this approximates the other proposed behaviour of having
distcc.$SITE.company.com have A records for all the servers, and then
doing locking etc by ip address. It has the advantage of requiring
less cooperation from the DNS administrators, but the disadvantage of
being a bit more of a special purpose hack.
I'd be very interested to hear from large sites, since i'm not one.
More information about the distcc