[distcc] compression question
Martin Pool
mbp at sourcefrog.net
Tue Feb 15 19:53:15 GMT 2005
On 15 Feb 2005, Brian Hall <brihall at pcisys.net> wrote:
> I am using two AMD64 Gentoo based PCs, a server with dual 1.8G Opterons
> and a client/workstation with a 2.0G S754 A64. The server has GBe, and
> so does the client, but I've recently discovered that the r8169 driver
> gives me NFS timeouts on high traffic (large NFS transfers), so I've
> dropped back to using a Intel PCI 100MB card (e100).
>
> My question is, given the above relatively fast hardware, is it worth it
> to enable lzo compression? I believe the A64 chips will compress very
> quickly. I am just looking to minimize the compilation slowdown caused
> by going from a GB connection for distcc to 100MB.
>
> My current config, with MAKEOPTS=-j6 in /etc/make.conf:
>
> # distcc-config --get-hosts
> zippy/4 localhost/2
>
> Proposed config, if it is likely to be faster:
> zippy/4,lzo localhost/2
It's probably pretty close; using compression might be faster. Could
you please time a kernel build with each setup and let us know?
--
Martin
More information about the distcc
mailing list