[distcc] small protocol extensions for -ftest-coverage, -fbranch-probabilities

[Dan Kegel]

Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 10:12:47AM -0700, Daniel Kegel wrote:
> 
>>Should the client have to specify which files it wants
>>back, or should the server just send back everything new?
> 
> 
> Maybe an ability to specify one or more optional exclusion patterns
> would be a good way to go?  That way the default is to send everything
> back, but it would be easy to say "don't send me the *.foo file(s)".

Aw, let's keep it simple for the moment, and add that when we need it.

-- 
My technical stuff: http://kegel.com
My politics: see http://www.misleader.org for examples of why I'm for regime change