[distcc] small protocol extensions for -ftest-coverage,
-fbranch-probabilities
Dan Kegel
dank at kegel.com
Sat Jun 26 02:04:19 GMT 2004
Martin Pool wrote:
> Alexandre had a plan to put the source directory into the .i file to
> fix the debug symbols. Maybe this should ride on that?
I think the first line of the .i has the absolute path
that needs to go into the .da file, maybe that will do.
>>(Heh. Notice my nefarious plan to eventually speed things
>>up and allow whole-program optimization by sending across
>>multiple .i files to the remote compiler in one request someday?)
>
>
> The only flexibility missing from protocol-3, I think, is jobs that
> need to have files operated upon by several successive commands.
That's going to be interesting.
But I see you're right; uploading muliple files is totally
there with protocol-3.
And I agree that the client should specify which files to retrieve.
- Dan
--
My technical stuff: http://kegel.com
My politics: see http://www.misleader.org for examples of why I'm for regime change
More information about the distcc
mailing list