[distcc] distcc 2.14 bugs in lzo code(?)

[Martin Pool]

On 25 May 2004, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <arekm at pld-linux.org> wrote:
> (again, this time I've subscribed so no need to moderator to approve my 
> previous posting)

Hi,

I'm not sure I understand your bug report.  At any rate I can't
reproduce it.

free(0) is a valid call.  dmalloc should be at most giving a warning
about it, not aborting.  If you really want you can go through and put
"if (ptr)" in front of it.

Do you see any failures when not using dmalloc?  What about if you use
valgrind?

-- 
Martin 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/distcc/attachments/20040610/2463207d/attachment.bin